tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7660844861872909261.post4674240899075872209..comments2023-03-28T18:30:05.613-04:00Comments on Reaction Wheel: So why not start in two places?Jerry Neumannhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11869373074132369401noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7660844861872909261.post-89993057549083565602007-07-25T12:57:00.000-04:002007-07-25T12:57:00.000-04:00http://www.greendimes.com/Nice to see that you are...http://www.greendimes.com/<BR/><BR/>Nice to see that you are blogging!Joshua Reichhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10303114242550248619noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7660844861872909261.post-44213175683811792632007-07-20T17:02:00.000-04:002007-07-20T17:02:00.000-04:00If you can figure this one out, you win. The chal...If you can figure this one out, you win. The challenge seems to be that the way things typically run, making money is often in tension with generating other kinds of value (like a democracy that represents the people rather than the corporate donors, a health care system where it makes sense to give sick people treatment, a scientific community that sees itself united in the project of building reliable knowledge rather than locked in a struggle for scarce funding and journal pages, etc.).<BR/><BR/>Whenever sacrificing another interest improves the bottom line, there's a good chance that interest will get sacrificed. How do you change the set up so that the bottom line depends on looking after the other interests (making the money what it ought to be, of value as an instrument rather than as an end ion itself)?Janet D. Stemwedelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07139109459337012160noreply@blogger.com